Sunday, April 22, 2012

Evolutionary Media


            The growth of digital technology has generated a large number of opinions on the long-term viability of the technological precursors to modern media. In considering the value of the opinions, or the potential for long term viability within the use of digital media, it is important to develop an analysis of previous technology in terms of media as well as what can be conceived of as a media-form to begin with.
            The interesting aspect of this consideration is that media itself is similar to a meme in that it is truly an intangible. Media is simply the transfer or conveyance of information from one source to another. The real discussion is over the potential of various mediums, and how those mediums are utilized to support the existence of media.
            In the current discourse the transfer of media has been changed from print to digital. The medium involved in the first form would be paper. Over the centuries paper has undergone a variety of changes in order to be adapted for various uses and to make use of improved technologies for its manufacture.
            There were numerous mediums used prior to paper including carved wood, engraved stone, systems of braid work, and various uses of beads. However, the true precursor would be vellum. Vellum is a finely processed form of calfskin.
            With vellum being the most technologically advanced form of processed leather it can be seen that the earlier form of medium used for the conveyance of information would have been untreated leather. This base form of the medium can then be viewed simply as information emblazoned upon skin.
            The earliest form of the same methodology would have been the use of tattoos to convey tribal affiliation, social rank, religious alignment, or other forms of pertinent information. The use of tattoos as a medium to convey information is so ancient that it has been found upon some of the oldest human remains.
            To understand the potential for long-term viability in current and new mediums of media distribution we must look at the lifecycle of the earlier mediums. The most specifically relevant factor in this lifecycle would be intent.
            Each medium begins its life with minor distribution that is focused on communicating information of specific information that is deemed to be highly important. The second stage for each medium is the expansion of distribution. The interesting fact in each case is that as distribution expands the social importance of the information being communicated decreases.
            The final stage in the existence of each medium occurs after the media has transferred to a new methodology of distribution. This stage is art.
            Just as tattooing and vellum have transferred to this final state where they are in the singular hands of artists, so we now see paper following the same path. Art stores sell hand-made paper. There are schools that teach the techniques of hand binding books. Even museums maintain displays of items wrought from paper.
            With this understanding we can see that artists are a key component to maintaining the heritage of technology and the memory of our species. This also provides a glimpse into the future.
            While we cannot yet predict what the next medium of media distribution will be, we can see that the social relevance of information being distributed in digital format has lapsed in importance in conjunction with a small select group of enthusiasts continuing to work with outmoded components of the technology.
            Just as all previous mediums have become designated as forms of artistic merit, we can now look forward to seeing the existing digital medium becoming elevated to the same level of creative expression when new forms and mediums come into play. 

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Digital Pyre

            Reporters Without Boarders is an amazing independent organization based out of France that works to maintain international freedom of the press and supports the pursuit of independent non-regulated media throughout the world.
            As a component of this noble effort they release an annual report that details the level of censorship enforced by the governments of every nation, country, and regime. Additionally, this report includes a list of countries that are described as “enemies of the internet”.
            “Enemies of the internet” include countries that block sites, threaten those who attempt to utilize mass media, and actively restrict digital communications such as has been done in:
    Bahrain
    Belarus
    Burma
    China
    Cuba
    Iran
    North Korea
    Saudi Arabia
    Syria
    Turkmenistan
    Uzbekistan
There is also a second list described as “under surveillance”. This list is technically more benign than the “enemies of the internet”, however it can be construed as representing a far greater level of ominous intent.
            The reason this second list is insidiously upsetting is due to the major nations that have been included, and the reasons for their inclusion. Representing primary nations that should be considered safe havens for free speech are France (the geographical home of Reporters Without Boarders) and Australia. The addition of Australia resulted from the wide spread use of a content filtering system that was intended to prevent the spread of child pornography. However, its’ development and function are too nonspecific to be considered as strictly existing for the enforcement of the single well intentioned concept that was used to justify its’ creation.
            The existence of this material then leads to the attempts to pass Internet restricting legislation within the United States. The latest effort to push this material consisted of a law called SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act).
            This law faced a drastic public outcry due to its’ capacity to allow the government to indiscriminately delete any online content without any form of trial or justification. Ostensibly the law was intended to prevent the spread of Internet based copyright violation. However, it had the same level of nonspecific flexibility as the system that got Australia placed on the “under surveillance” list.
            This means that had the law passed the United States would be placed on the list as well. The United States has long been considered to be the ultimate supporting nation of free speech. The nation takes great pride in this fact. And yet, the U.S. nearly joined the list of nations that hold little regard for such an important principle.
            Fortunately, the citizens of the U.S. were able to use their right to free speech in order to prevent the law from being passed. And, with the aid of organizations such as Reporters Without Boarders the citizens of every nation shall one day be able to enjoy the same capacities.


Cooper, Charlie (2012). Meet the ‘Enemies of the Internet’ 2012. Retrieved April 1, 2012 from http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57395455-93/meet-the-enemies-of-the-internet-2012/





    <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/31100268?byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>